main| new issue| archive| editorial board| for the authors| publishing house|
Πσρρκθι
Main page
New issue
Archive of articles
Editorial board
For the authors
Publishing house

 

 


ABSTRACTS OF ARTICLES OF THE JOURNAL "INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES".
No. 10. Vol. 30. 2024

DOI: 10.17587/it.30.537-543

A. V. Pimenov, Student, V. A. Efimova, Ph.D., Assistant,
ITMO, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation,
N. M. Nazarenko
, Student,
T. G. Shevchenko PSU, Tiraspol, Moldova

Protecting Drawings at Production and Regime Facilities Using Neural Network Technology and DLP Systems

The existing methods of object image processing are analyzed. Problems of using the considered methods within the framework of DLP systems are considered. A new object image processing method was presented that allows processing of complex images. A metric of accuracy and completeness of plagiarism image detection was used to evaluate the quality of the developed method. Testing was carried out using image ranking to analyze the ability of the model to search for semantics. Comparative testing was carried out with the method based on raster neural models. The advantages and disadvantages of the developed method were highlighted, as well as options for further developmentAs a result of this work, a method for processing object images in native format has been developed. The main advantage of the developed method is the high rate of accuracy (87 %) and completeness (100 %). This study can be useful for further research in the field of vector image analysis. Also, the developed method can be applied as a tool similarly to raster methods of image processing (image search, classification, search for objects in the image).
Keywords: convolutional neural networks, DLP systems, computer vision, vector image analysis, drawing analysis, drawing similarity search

P. 537-543

References

  1. Leila Z., Omar E., Dieter R. A framework for similarity recognition of CAD models, Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 2016, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 274—285.
  2. Bharadwaj M., Shubham D., Sai M., Viekash V. K., Ramanathan M. 'CADSketchNet' — An Annotated Sketch dataset for 3D CAD Model Retrieval with Deep Neural Networks, Computers & Graphics, 2021, vol. 99, pp. 100—113.
  3. Dershung Y., Rendell L., Webster J., Shaw D., Garrett J. Symbol recognition in a cad environment using a neural network, International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, 2011, vol. 3.
  4. Nursel O., Ferruh O. Neural network based non-standard feature recognition to integrate CAD and CAM, Computers in Industry, 2001, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 123—135.
  5. Lee J., Lee H., Mun D. 3D convolutional neural network for machining feature recognition with gradient-based visual explanations from 3D CAD models, Scientific Reports, 2022, vol. 12.
  6. Sezavar A., Farsi H., Mohamadzadeh S. Content-based image retrieval by combining convolutional neural networks and sparse representation, Multimed Tools, 2019, vol. 78, pp. 20895—20912.
  7. Huaping W., Huaping F., Huaping L. Understanding the Behaviour of Contrastive Loss. 2021, pp. 2495—2504.
  8. Chang H. B., Lee H. S. Design and Implementation of Information Security System to Prevent Leakage of Drawing Information, Transactions of the Society of CAD/CAM Engineers, 2006, vol. 12, pp. 131—152.
  9. Yablokova I. V., Volkov S. D. Production secret (know-how) as a protected result of intellectual activity of entrepreneurs, Economics and ecological management, 2016, vol. 7, pp. 1523—1633 (in Russian).
  10. Ritendra D., Dhiraj J., Jia L., James Z. W. Image retrieval: Ideas, influences, and trends of the new age, ACM Comput. Surv, 2008, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 60.
  11. Li. T., Li l., Jonathan M., Jonathan G., Jonathan M., Jonathan R. Differentiable vector graphics rasterization for editing and learning, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2020, pp. 1—15.
  12. Dosovitskiy A., Dosovitskiy B., Kolesnikov L., Weissen-born A., Zhai D., Unterthiner X., Dehghani T., Minderer M., Hei­gold M., Gelly G., Sylvain U., Houlsby J. An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale, ICLR 2021 — 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  13. Alfredo N., Pablo M. O., Zoubin G., Isabel V. Handling incomplete heterogeneous data using VAEs, Pattern Recognition, 2020, vol. 107.
  14. Frederik W., Martin J., Javier C., Soren H. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2021, pp. 12158—12168.
  15. Huang C., Huang L., Xiaoou C., Xiaoou T. Local Similarity-Aware Deep Feature Embedding, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2016, vol. 36, no. 2.
  16. Zhuwei Q., Fuxun Y., Chenchen L., Xiang C. How convolutional neural network see the world — A survey of convolutional neural network visualization methods, Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2018, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 149—180.
  17. Radwan T., Yousef S. Data Leakage/Loss Prevention Systems (DLP), International Journal of Information Systems, 2014, pp. 13—19.
  18. Xiaoju M., Bo L., Ying Z., Ming Y. The Canny Edge Detection and Its Improvement, 2012, pp. 50—58.
  19. Hummel R. A., Kimia B., Zucker S. W. Deblurring Gaussian blur, Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 1987, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 66—80.
  20. Arun D., Vanita J. Comparative Study of Convolution Neural Network's Relu and Leaky-Relu Activation Functions, Applications of Computing, Automation and Wireless Systems in Electrical Engineering, 2019, pp. 873—880.
  21. Bo-Christer B., Mikael L. CAD standardisation in the construction industry — A process view, Automation in Construction, 2010, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 398—406.
  22. Teterkin I. A., Molnina E. V. Analysis of popular stock image repositories, Progressive Technologies and Economics in Mechanical Engineering: Proceedings of the X All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference for Students and Pupils, 2019, pp. 233—235 (in Russian).
  23. Oleneva N. R., Semyashkina D. S. Russian and foreign developments in information security, Information and Security, 2018. val. 21, no. 3, pp. 380—383 (in Russian).

 

To the contents