main| new issue| archive| editorial board| for the authors| publishing house|
Πσρρκθι
Main page
New issue
Archive of articles
Editorial board
For the authors
Publishing house

 

 


ABSTRACTS OF ARTICLES OF THE JOURNAL "INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES".
No. 4. Vol. 30. 2024

DOI: 10.17587/it.30.171-183

V. P. Korneenko, Cand. of Tech. Sc., Associate Professor,
Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow

A Method for Constructing the Resulting Scale for Objects Presented in Interval Estimates in Multi-Criteria Evaluation and Selection Tasks

For the tasks of multi-criteria evaluation and selection under uncertainty conditions, the most accurate is the presentation of object estimates in an interval form, which allows you to preserve the completeness of information. The correct application of the additive data aggregation mechanism in multi-criteria problems presented in various measurement scales requires that the initial estimates be transformed into the resulting homogeneous scales characterized by the same scope and number of gradations. At the same time, there is a problem of converting interval estimates into point estimates. The idea of the method for intersecting interval estimates and a large number of objects is to construct a histogram, and then equally divide the original measurement scale into segments, the numbers of which are identified with the point gradations of the resulting scale. An example of solving the problem of multi-criteria evaluation and comparison of a civil helicopter project relative to competitors in terms of tactical and technical characteristics and with interval-set sales prices is given.
Keywords: initial and resulting measurement scales, homogeneous scale, equally powerful division of the criterion scale, canonical scale

P. 171-183

References

  1. Hubbard D. U. How to measure anything. Valuation of the intangible in business, Moscow, ZAO "Olimp-biznes", 2009, 320 p. (in Russian).
  2. Kendall M. G., Stuart A. The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2: Inference and Relationship, London, Charles and Company Limited, 1961, 676 p.
  3. Sternin M. Yu., Chugunov N. V., Shepelev G. I. Generalized interval estimates in models of subject areas of expert decision support systems, Trudy ISA RAN. 2005, vol. 12, pp. 95—113 (in Russian).
  4. Aleksandrovich Yu. S., Gordeev V. I. Evaluation and prognostic scales in the medicine of critical conditions, S.-Pb., Sotis, 2007, 140 p. (in Russian).
  5. Savilov S. I. Consideration of interval uncertainty in assessing the effectiveness of investment projects in the non-stationary economy of Russia. Assumptions and methods, Trudy ISA RAN, 2016, vol. 66, no 1, pp. 58—63 (in Russian).
  6. Kobyakov P. K., Gorin E. A. Methods of operational monitoring of the effectiveness of educational institutions based on a set of interval expert assessments of private indicators, Innovat'on, 2014, no. 11 (193), pp. 124—128 (in Russian).
  7. Kuznetsov V. P. Interval statistical models, Moscow, Radio and Communications, 1991, 352 p. (in Russian).
  8. Bardachev Yu. N., Kryuchkovsky V. V., Malomuzh T. V. Methodological preference of interval expert assessments in decision-making under conditions of uncertainty, Bulletin of Khark'v National Un'vers'ty, 2010, no. 890, pp. 18—28 https://mia.univer.kharkov.ua. (In Ukraina).
  9. 9. Kalmykov S. A., Shokin Yu. I., Yuldashev Z. H. Methods of interval analysis, Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1986, 222 p. (in Russian).
  10. Shari S. P. Finite-dimensional interval analysis, Novosibirsk, XYZ Publishing House, 2022, 654 p.
  11. Orlov A. I. Statistics of interval data (generalizing article), Factory laboratory, Diagnostics of materials, 2015, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 61—69 (in Russian).
  12. Zadeh L. A. Fuzzy Sets, Information Control, 1965, no. 8, pp. 338—353.
  13. Beynon Μ ., Curry B., Morgan P. The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: an alternative approach to multicriteria decision modeling, Internationak Jornal Omega, 2000, vol. 28, pp. 37—50.
  14. Lyuger J. F. I Artificial intelligence: strategies and methods for solving complex problems, Moscow, Williams, 2003, 864 p. (in Russian).
  15. Davydov D. V. Interval methods and models of decision-making in economics: Abstract. dissertation of the Doctor of Economics, Moscow, Publishing House of the Plekhanov REA, 2009, 47 p. (in Russian).
  16. Perepelitsa V. A., Tebueva F. B. Discrete optimization problems with interval parameters, Journal of Computational Mathematics. and math. phys., 2010, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 836—847 (in Russian).
  17. Levin V. I. Interval approach to optimization under uncertainty, Control, communication and security systems, 2015, no. 4, pp. 836—847.
  18. Pfanzagl J. Theory of measurement, New York, John Wiley, 1968, 235 p.
  19. Vasin A. A., Krasnoshchekov P. S., Morozov V. V. Issledovanie operatsii, Moscow, Akademiya, 2008, 170 p. (in Russian).
  20. Korneenko V. P. Optimization methods, Moscow, Higher School, 2007, 664 p. (in Russian).
  21. Kendall M. G. Rank correlation methods, New York, Oxford University, 1990, 260 p.
  22. Uvarov V. B. Mathematical analysis, Moscow, Higher School, 1984, 288 p. (in Russian).
  23. Kolmogorov A. N., Fomin S. V. Elements of the theory of functions and functional analysis, Moscow, Nauka, 1989, 624 p. (in Russian).
  24. Analysis of the civil helicopter market based on the results of the 1st half of 2022, available at: https://afk.rukon.ru/analitika/post-1573 (in Russian).
  25. Tishchenko E. I. Comparative analysis of modern helicopters, Actual problems of modern helicopters, 2018, vol. 2, pp. 428—430 (in Russian).
  26. Korneenko V. P. Method of local aggregation of data of objects with multilevel structure in ordinal scales, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference "Management of large-scale systems development" (MLSD-2021), Moscow, IPU RAS, 2021, pp. 485—493 (in Russian).

To the contents