| 
  ||||||||||
 
      
  | 
      
 DOI: 10.17587/it.24.529-537 A. E. Aleksandrov, Ph. D., Professor, e-mail: femsystem@yandex.ru, Moscow Technological University (MIREA) Moscow, 107996, Russian Federation Evaluation of the Reliability of Metal Testing Results Based on an Alternative Algorithm The  problem was set to reconstruct the characteristics of the instrument for  non-destructive testing and justify the initial defectiveness for using it in  construction of mathematical models for calculating and predicting the level of  safety of energy facilities. A description of the solution of the direct  problem for correcting the distribution of detected defects and constructing  their actual distribution is given. A method for solving the inverse problem is  developed to reconstruct the characteristics of the instrument used to measure  the defectiveness of the objects under investigation on the basis of an  alternative algorithm. A technique is proposed for processing the results of  defectiveness in order to justify its use in calculating and predicting the  level of safety of energy facilities. An alternative algorithm for  reconstructing the actual size of the defects and the characteristics of the  measuring instruments (the probability function for detecting a defect of a  given size) on the results of the performed metal testing is developed on the  basis of the revealed feature of the selected distribution functions of the  detected and actual defect sizes. For the developed original and alternative  algorithms, a numerical study of the effect of input disturbances on the  results of the reconstructed parameters is conducted. The alternative algorithm  for reconstructing the actual sizes of defects and characteristics of measuring  instruments presented in this paper has a lower sensitivity to perturbing input  errors than the original algorithm, is more resistant to input errors, and  allows obtaining more reliable data for constructing mathematical models for  calculating and predicting the safety level of energy objects. P. 529–537  | 
    |||||||||